The.Voyage.That.Shook.The.World.2009.DVDRip.XviD-aAF96
9:36 PM - October 23rd, 2009 | Posted in DVDRip/BDRip, Movies | By: Fr0zenMovies
ReeGed: Aright I had to call this lunacy to your attention because it would be unfair to have you download it otherwise. This film was commissioned by Creation Ministries International. Basically the kind of lunatics who take the bible as literal truth, word for word (and also deniers of the fact of Evolution). What they’ve done in this film is present a distorted view of Darwin and his history to what i can only assume is to fit their views (read the wiki for more information). This is such a pathetic attempt at trying to undermine what by now is the fact of evolution (supported by mountains of scientific evidence). I actually saw something similar done by Kirk Cameron and his crew of loonies (the same guys who found out that the banana is proof of god, rofl) HERE, we’re they’re handing out their own edited versions of Darwins “Origin of Species”.
Quality: DVDRip, nice and crisp 
Synopsis: In celebration of the 200th anniversary of Charles Darwin’s birth, this insightful documentary retraces the scientist’s infamous, five-year research trip on the HMS Beagle. Featuring dramatic recreations and commentary from leading scholars, The Voyage That Shook the World examines the observations and experiments that led to Darwin’s groundbreaking theory of evolution.
 |
 |
 |
Ratings: IMDB: 5.9/10.0 (34 votes) | RT: N/A
Genre: Documentary | Biography
Directed by: Steve Murray
Starring: Antoni Biernacki, Mike Casten, Sam Downes, Drew Kelly, Liam Norris
Language: English
First Cinematic Release: 21 May 2009 (Australia)
Release Name: The.Voyage.That.Shook.The.World.2009.DVDRip.XviD-aAF
Video: XviD @ 1404 Kbps - 624×352px (WxH) - AR: 16/9 - FPS: 25.000 fps
Audio: MP3 @ 448 Kbps (Constant) - 6 channels
Size: 52 Files @ 721.4MB
Runtime: Release - 53 mins
Filename: aaf-voyage.that.shook.the.world
Links: NFO, Wikipedia, Allmovie, YouTube Trailer
Download: Torrent Search | Download Search | Usenet Search | NinjaVideo | Subtitles
October 23rd, 2009 at 9:38 pm
Nice work Fr0zen.
I’m hoping more films about Darwin and the fact of Evolution will be released this year.
Update: Ok check out the intro I updated.
October 23rd, 2009 at 9:43 pm
I created all living creatures at the same time, including the various stages of man that scientists have discovered via fossils (which I put in the earth just as my little joke!). 10,000 years ago when I created Earth, then flooded it cos I was having a bad day and tried to kill everything, Noah put two of each animal on his Ark, including T-rexs, stegosauruses, brontosauruses and so on. One might ask "how did they all fit on there and what did they eat for all that time afloat?", but I move in mysterious ways and must be off now………. I have prayers to ignore……….
October 23rd, 2009 at 9:44 pm
More:
http://h33t.com/userdetails.php?id=128558
http://thepiratebay.org/user/extremezone/
http://extratorrent.com/profile/extremezone/torrents/
Download:
http://letitbit.net/download/0279.088421098cd5f933d5c51a6669/fwint.com_aaf_voyage.that.shook.the.world.avi.html
or
http://www.storage.to/get/TSBhtulS/fwint.com-aaf-voyage.that.shook.the.world.avi
or
http://rapidshare.com/files/296932385/fwint.com-aaf-voyage.that.shook.the.world.part1.rar
http://rapidshare.com/files/296932123/fwint.com-aaf-voyage.that.shook.the.world.part2.rar
http://rapidshare.com/files/296933317/fwint.com-aaf-voyage.that.shook.the.world.part3.rar
http://rapidshare.com/files/296932911/fwint.com-aaf-voyage.that.shook.the.world.part4.rar
or
http://www.storage.to/get/mIAlaneW/fwint.com-aaf-voyage.that.shook.the.world.part1.rar
http://www.storage.to/get/cB6DBVRG/fwint.com-aaf-voyage.that.shook.the.world.part2.rar
http://www.storage.to/get/hPNuKTS5/fwint.com-aaf-voyage.that.shook.the.world.part3.rar
http://www.storage.to/get/yWxHcIOj/fwint.com-aaf-voyage.that.shook.the.world.part4.rar
or
http://netload.in/dateiR9i6WsMdpv/fwint.com-aaf-voyage.that.shook.the.world.part1.rar.htm
http://netload.in/datei5IEuK87qHm/fwint.com-aaf-voyage.that.shook.the.world.part2.rar.htm
http://netload.in/dateir6NlqHlyiM/fwint.com-aaf-voyage.that.shook.the.world.part3.rar.htm
http://netload.in/datei76BSQbQw2B/fwint.com-aaf-voyage.that.shook.the.world.part4.rar.htm
or
http://hotfile.com/dl/15593475/1dfd2b4/fwint.com-aaf-voyage.that.shook.the.world.part1.rar.html
http://hotfile.com/dl/15593185/f8cef50/fwint.com-aaf-voyage.that.shook.the.world.part2.rar.html
http://hotfile.com/dl/15593184/8529e36/fwint.com-aaf-voyage.that.shook.the.world.part3.rar.html
http://hotfile.com/dl/15593182/5b8bc59/fwint.com-aaf-voyage.that.shook.the.world.part4.rar.html
no password,enjoy
October 23rd, 2009 at 9:50 pm
The.Voyage.That.Shook.The.World.2009.DVDRip.XviD-aAF400 MB || No Password
http://hotfile.com/dl/15598095/180caba/The.Voyage.That.Shook.The.World.2009.DVDRip.XviD-aAF.part1.rar.html
http://hotfile.com/dl/15599302/4da15d9/The.Voyage.That.Shook.The.World.2009.DVDRip.XviD-aAF.part2.rar.html
Apparently a fake link - panda
October 23rd, 2009 at 10:28 pm
Evolution is a hoax though.
October 23rd, 2009 at 11:03 pm
The best bit about that banana thing, (among it’s many many flaws) is that the bananas we eat today and of which they talk about are product of man. Bananas actually support the theory of evolution.
The original wild bananas are practically inedible, but humans have cultivated this seedless (and sterile) variety all this time - without us the banana would die off. Also of note: the current variety banana we eat comes from a well documented genetic mutation (evolution anyone) which created a sweet, more edible fruit.
October 23rd, 2009 at 11:14 pm
I find it funny that Reeged had to inject his bias into the description of the movie. Evolution fact? I don’t think so. It can’t even tell us how life began in the first place just what it did once it started. I am not saying to believe the bible or any other religious belief but it pays to keep an open mind. I for one believe in science but don’t take Evolution as fact but as what it is theory.
October 23rd, 2009 at 11:19 pm
The.Voyage.That.Shook.The.World.2009.DVDRip.XviD-aAF
200 MB || No Password
http://rapidshare.com/files/297019135/fwint.com-aaf-voyage.that.shook.the.world.part1.rar
http://rapidshare.com/files/297017774/fwint.com-aaf-voyage.that.shook.the.world.part2.rar
http://rapidshare.com/files/297019136/fwint.com-aaf-voyage.that.shook.the.world.part3.rar
http://rapidshare.com/files/297013183/fwint.com-aaf-voyage.that.shook.the.world.part4.rar
October 23rd, 2009 at 11:27 pm
Think I’ll give this a miss, If I want to hear total bull**** I’ll listen to Gordon Brown
October 23rd, 2009 at 11:41 pm
Evolution is a fact and a theory. Evolution will never tell us how life began in the first place, merely how it has evolved. There’s not a shred of evidence to point towards the existence of ANY god, so the chances of the Christian version of a god being the creator out of all of the other gods that humans have invented over the millennia isn’t even worth considering. You might as well be as open minded about that as you are of a technicolour dragon called Maureen shitting the universe into existence. It’s about as plausible an explanation as the Christian one.
Christianity is nothing more than a security blanket for those that cannot accept their own mortality. I would never claim to know how the universe came to be, yet a Christian is certain that they know how it happened, so if you want an example of arrogant closed mindedness, you don’t have to look much further than in the direction of your nearest brainwashed Christian to find it.
October 23rd, 2009 at 11:42 pm
@ 6 (pandaking): I know I just love the irony of it all.
@ 7 (LOL): If you want to call me biased to evidence then yes that I am. Also, last I checked Darwinian Evolution doesn’t attempt to explain how life started.
Even so we have some very plausible ideas of how life on earth as we know it started.
October 23rd, 2009 at 11:54 pm
Id like someone to point me in the direction of the evidence that supports that we evolved from monkeys, and im not talking the old line that says hey we look similar their brains are this close they have five fingers, im talking actual evidence.
October 23rd, 2009 at 11:59 pm
Seeing the description, this must be worth some good lawlz!!!
October 24th, 2009 at 12:21 am
The only loon I see here is the original poster, "Frozen." If you think something is absurd, then you should probably just ignore it, eh?
October 24th, 2009 at 12:24 am
Great job, will watch this for sure.
October 24th, 2009 at 12:34 am
@ 12 (Mark): What would you class as “actual evidence”?
@ 14 (Mac): We post stuff your enjoyment not ours, as you will see from the comments some people want to watch this. If you don’t like a release, skip over it - no need to bash someone spending their free time doing something for you.
October 24th, 2009 at 12:48 am
OP is a moron
October 24th, 2009 at 12:52 am
Who wants to bet that the people calling the OP a moron and asking for evidence about evolution are all Yanks? I’d say "go and read a book about evolution", but I doubt such a thing exists in the US as they’ve probably all been burned.
October 24th, 2009 at 1:01 am
It seems that the OP hasn’t fully evolved yet and is in a very primitive state.
And to claim that evolution is fact is just as hilarious as Christianity.
October 24th, 2009 at 1:02 am
Actually, I’m Canadian. America is probably the leader, along with the UK, in pro-evolutionary propaganda, so your comment is ignorant.
Go read Darwin’s actual books. I find them highly entertaining. His disdain of the Irish far surpasses his zeal for science or his dislike of Catholicism. One could call THE DESCENT OF MAN less biological science and more anthropological and moral advocacy on how to eradicate Irish immigrants in Britain.
I am amused by the ignoramuses who spout off about Darwin when they haven’t even read his actual books. This is about Darwin, not MODERN evolutionary theory, which is VERY far removed from Darwin’s original ideas.
October 24th, 2009 at 1:08 am
@ post 20: I think this is incorrect. If anything, America is still in a backwards-thinking pro-religion state of mind, just like the various Middle Eastern countries it is always forcefully invading.
October 24th, 2009 at 1:15 am
@ 20 (Mac): Yes modern evolutionary theory is different in the sense that we now have a mountain of evidence to support Darwins original idea. But evidence usually doesn’t matter much to deniers of Evolution. Faith seems to be more important.
October 24th, 2009 at 1:16 am
"It can’t even tell us how life began in the first place just what it did once it started."
The origin of life has nothing to do with the theory of evolution. It’s like asking why you don’t get grass with a hamburger.
October 24th, 2009 at 1:20 am
What I find amusing is the fact that when an opposing point of view is presented in this respect, people get defensive and attack it. If you are so secure in your belief, then there shouldn’t be a need to ridicule others beliefs because they differ from yours. Some could say what you believe is a "religion" in itself. The point being, respect your neighbors beliefs even though they might contradict yours.
Charles Darwin wrote a book called, "The Origin Of The Species", with the keyword here being Origin yet never defined an "origin". Just started the process after the advent of life.
Yes there are hypotheses on how life began, some being more fantastical than the other: lightning strikes a primordial ooze some how sparking life, crystals, and aliens just to name a few.
Look, we all have strong opinions on the subject. The point of my post is to point out how we can all have different views on something and talk intelligently about it even though we might not agree and think the other is wrong.
October 24th, 2009 at 1:26 am
Bananas were intelligently designed to be edible by man.
And this proves evolution happens all by itself? That’s brilliant!
Anymore prof out there I don’t know about? Because God knows (and apparently Europe) we yanks don’t study both sides of an argument to find out the truth.
October 24th, 2009 at 1:32 am
well thanks for the post but i could have done without reeged’s stupid editorial comments, who the fuck cares, if i want to see the stupid movie, i’ll see it, i don’t really give a shit about your personal opinion on evolution. with the next release of juno are you gonna shout out your opinions on abortion? or how journey to the center of the earth is ridiculous because science shows dinosaurs are extinct? nobody gives a flying fuck, keep it to yourself.
October 24th, 2009 at 1:49 am
@ 26 (wah wah wah): Actually, I give a flying fuck, and so do many others. Otherwise, we might’ve thought this film was based on facts, and not known it was "commissioned by Creation Ministries International … the kind of lunatics who take the bible as literal truth." Thanks reeged.
October 24th, 2009 at 1:56 am
@27
Are you so weak minded that you need to have someone tell you that something isn’t fact? In other words, you would like to be spoon-fed ideas from others instead of coming to a conclusion yourself, wow.
October 24th, 2009 at 2:01 am
Folks, the terrible IMDB rating is indication enough that this film is awful. Frozen could simply have labeled this as "propaganda" instead of going off on his tirade, which makes him sound just as fanatical and loony as the people whom he is ridiculing.
#24 is spot on. What happened to "tolerance"? If you disagree with someone, then intelligently state your stance if you are so inclined –condescendingly belittling others just exposes how INSECURE you are.
October 24th, 2009 at 2:04 am
It seems this post has brought out all the religious nuts who troll zerosec
October 24th, 2009 at 2:04 am
YA! Thank reeged we might have downloaded this and actually heard what the opponents of evolution had to say. That was a close one.
October 24th, 2009 at 2:09 am
Absolute fundamentalist, creationist rubbish.
October 24th, 2009 at 2:28 am
I agree with all those persons who insist Darwinism is not a fact. The theory of evolution is a theory after all. Whom I disagree with is all those other people who insist creationism deserves an equal standing within the scientific community. The specious arguments set forth by creationists to support their claims just make my head ache. After all if your best argument is a microscopic organism that evolutionists have demonstrated just might have evolved after all, well, isn’t that just too desperate? Archeologists and anthropologists are finding fossils every day that support evolution and nobody and nothing has ever found anything that suggests creation could have taken place. If they had we sure would have heard about it by now!
October 24th, 2009 at 2:41 am
If you don’t believe the theory of evolution by now then you are a fool, plain and simple. I’m not surprised to see the word theory used in completely the wrong way in this thread, even by those who are pro-evolution - a theory in science has to have a proposal, evidence, empirical data, repeatable experimention and explanation in that order. It’s not a set of wild guesses based on speculation or complete unprovable rubbbish like intelligent design. Dunno why I’m bothering to explain, fools are not gonna change their mind are they?
Go read some Richard Dawkins fools. Or better yet, don’t breed and then you won’t evolve any further to curse the rest of us with more Creationists!
October 24th, 2009 at 2:49 am
@24 - you’re wrong, the key words are both "origin" and "species". Darwins aim with this book was not to explain how life got started but to illustrate the idea of evolution and explain how the species of animals living on the earth at his time evolved from older and different species in the past, and ultimately to explain what we ourselves evolved from - something he only actually briefly mentions in the book itself as a result of fear of persecution from the religious authorities of the time.
Again, people (mostly Creationists) misrepresent Darwin here by arguing that he cannot explain where life came from in the first place - something like saying because a plumber cannot tell you the process that gets water into a house he cannot fit a sink! He wasn’t trying to explain where the first lifeforms came from or how, only how all other life forms evolved from it.
October 24th, 2009 at 2:52 am
@ 24 (LOL): I appreciate the reasoned post but a few things:
1. Calling belief of evolution a ‘religion in itself’ is ridiculous. Religion implies blind faith, absence of need for proof. The theory of evolution is based on scientific principles, which require evidence. If some jackass believes in evolution just because he hates religion (ie not because of evidence), then he’s not religious, just a jackass.
2. I believe ‘The Origin of Species’ refers to the origin of individual species. That is, they evolved from other species.
I agree with everything else you say, except want to point out that the theory of evolution has nothing to do with the origin of life…. unless it was aliens.
October 24th, 2009 at 3:16 am
This kind of releases always get a debate going. God is dead. Peace
October 24th, 2009 at 4:20 am
You won’t convince these people by making rational points. They base their beliefs in faith, which is not a rational thing to begin with.
You can point out x amount of evidence, you can point out x amount of religious absurdities… and it will not make one bit of difference. Just call them what they are (ignorant) and move on, most of the garbage they spout is not even worth justifying with a response.
October 24th, 2009 at 4:55 am
Yeah… it’s just harder to do when they try to turn things back around on you and distort shit to mislead. Many who spout the classic bullshit responses just don’t know any better because someone told them the same shit. I’m not sure what the solution is, but just ignoring the problem won’t make it go away. As long as they other side is actively engaging people, ignoring just lets the problem spread.
October 24th, 2009 at 5:01 am
Hmm so here we go again. Creationist spouting off about missing links and "it’s only a theory" and so on. So last time I looked the evidence for evolution consisted of:
- DNA
- Anatomy
- Embryology
- Fossils
- Basic physics
- Speciation
- Direct observation (yes, direct observation).
Each of these cascade to literally millions of items of experimentally proved evidence.
When we compare this with the bible and religious arguments their evidence is:
- Wishful thinking
Who’s case is the strongest?
October 24th, 2009 at 5:01 am
http://www.400monkeys.com/God//
October 24th, 2009 at 5:02 am
best god related FAQs website lol
October 24th, 2009 at 5:07 am
For Mark @12, if you want evidence that you are descended from a monkey go look at your parents. Seriously.
October 24th, 2009 at 5:14 am
the two hotfiles Slavik posted at post 4 are fake, what u get is this:
Microsoft.Windows.XP.Professional.SP3.Integrated.September.2009.Corporate.Unattended-UP2DATE
Thanks for wasting my time jerk
October 24th, 2009 at 6:05 am
lots of post but have not seen anyone post any actual evidence that supports evolution. they just say fossils support it. really which ones?
they say dna supports it. really how?
October 24th, 2009 at 6:44 am
"they say dna supports it. really how?"
lol.
Fossils show how various animals and plants have evolved over millennia.
DNA shows us the genetic lineage, its mutations, what we call evolution.
"All things bright and beautiful, All creatures great and small, All things wise and wonderful: The Lord God made them all" Doesn’t really cut the mustard when it comes to scientific Fact. Does it?
October 24th, 2009 at 7:44 am
One proof I would really love to see, is how we humans evolved or inherited the propensity for "faith" itself. That is, the belief in a "story" (whether fictional or based on experience) to fill in our gaps in understanding.
We all have faith that the sun will come up tomorrow - based largely on our experience that it always has. We all live our lives and make our decisions based on "assumptions" around what we have experienced or learned.
For example, we were taught in school about the elements, the Periodic Table. How do we know it’s all true? Well, it’s in all the books, and most other people accept it, and we know it’s used to make everything we see around us. The point is, we haven’t *experienced* all that ourselves, or made those discoveries ourselves - rather, we have *faith* that it’s true, largely based on our experience of *it all fitting together*. That is, everything we learn in science seems to support everything else we’ve learned from it, so it all makes logical sense. It’s all consistent.
If humans didn’t have the ability to assume, believe and have faith based on what we’re told, we’d go nuts having to prove every little thing to everyone all the time.
So the curious thing about religion *is not faith* as such. We all have that. The odd thing is that a group of people adopt a system of faith which is *not consistent* with most other self-supporting, experience-based and "provable" beliefs (I’m carefully not using the word "fact").
That’s what science is, after all. A series of interwoven, self-supporting, beliefs, all consistent with experience and observation of the real world.
And what is religious faith? It’s also based on experience - people always talk about "experiencing God". I do believe they have some kind of experience which is obviously quite real to them. I haven’t had it, so I don’t know it, but I’m not going to mock it. One day we might know what that experience means.
So see what I mean? "Faith" isn’t the issue - we all have that and use it every day, it’s an essential survival tool. Even scientists have faith - they believe passionately that the universe "makes sense". That faith drives them to look for connections and reasons for things. If they didn’t have that faith in a "logical universe", we wouldn’t have science at all.
What religions have done, is create a story, or doctrine, around the "experience" of their spiritual Faith. Personally, I don’t question a religious person’s *own experience* of their Faith. But I do (and we should) question the doctrine.
I would never question the Faith of a Muslim or Christian or whomever - in fact I have great respect for the *experience* of Faith, even if I don’t have it myself. But I do question the Mullahs and the Priests, who are part of the establishment and may have political motives well beyond the religious experience, sometimes completely detached from it altogether.
Science is wonderful and full of mysteries. The religious experience is wonderful and full of mysteries. They both seek a "larger truth". They both tap into our human need for answers and to believe we have a special place in the universe.
Most religious people accept science, and most scientists won’t say "god doesn’t exist" (Dawkins is a sad exception). There is basically no argument between science and religion, except what the vocal few in each camp create.
Both science and religion will ALWAYS be with us, as they always have. By now, we can’t deny that both are very fundamental expressions of human nature. Can’t we just friggin accept that and respect each other’s experiences?
October 24th, 2009 at 8:11 am
"Dawkins is the sad exception"
Erm, no he isn’t. Take Stephen Hawking for example. Possibly the greatest thinker of the late 20th century.
Science and religion are often at odds. You only have to look back to the trial of Galileo to recognise this fact. Though the exception to this fact comes in the form of a Catholic priest called Mendel. The father of modern genetics.
October 24th, 2009 at 8:15 am
This is what you see when extreme fundamentalism happens.
October 24th, 2009 at 9:01 am
I just wanted to say that Evolution is most certainly not a fact. It is still a theory. Before people begin to rant and rave you really should do research yourself and build your own opinion. Also, frozen, it’s one thing to state your opinion, but the words you chose to use were uncalled for and all you did was make yourself look extremely childish.